Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (148877)	9/3/2018 7:16:57 PM
From: Jim Mullens	Read Replies (1) of 197254

Art, re: QCOM / Supreme Court Quanta Case Ruling ???? “...The Supreme Court decision exempted Qualcomm's licensing agreements from the exhaustion limitation because, as the court noted, it was a contractual arrangement agreed to by both sides. That exemption appears to justify the way Qualcomm licenses the use of its patents....” >>>>>> We’ve discussed the Quanta case on this board in the past, but I don’t recall that case specifically pertaining to QCOM’s licensing agreement...... specifically exempting QCOM from exhaustion. Is the QCOM exemption referred to in the SC Quanta ruling, or is this your /others interpretation of such?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next