SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 164.53-0.4%Jan 14 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JeffreyHF who wrote (148860)9/3/2018 10:13:49 PM
From: lml5 Recommendations

Recommended By
AlfaNut
lrnin
manning18
matherandlowell
voop

   of 197215
 
FTC is claiming that since . . . interpretation of obligations made to 3GPP and ETSI, under the controlling French law, are irrelevant, and U.S. courts should independently define FRAND obligations under U.S. law without regard to the intent and understanding of the overarching FRAND commitments made by Qualcomm to the primary international bodies.

Agree. FTC appears to be overreaching here. Can't see how FRAND can have one meaning in one jurisdiction, and another meaning in another when interpreting and/or enforcing licensing agreements that transcend jurisdictional borders in practically all instances.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext