<<..As P.T. Barnum says.........>>Or, "Bring me an Elefant and I'll name him JUMBO; Bring me a Midget and I'll call him Bill or was it Tom Thumb; and Bring me a Gorilla and I'll call it Chucakong!"
I will now add a disclaimer to what was added by another a few posts after the Billheretoreferedpost ( Basically I say at the Bottom Here, if standard Freegold can be found then Non Standard Complex Mineralization can infact revolutionize the mining industry...it is simply there...if there it can be recovered, if assayed by an Arizona Certified Lab as to value then Gold has Been deposited there<I am not stating values>:
From The S.I. Front Page Link:
SEC planning Internet guidelines
'Signposts' to show how U.S. securities laws apply to the Net
REUTER
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will soon issue guidance on how federal securities laws apply to the Internet, an official said Friday. The planned move comes at a crucial time, as online financial services surge in popularity and erode national boundaries.
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
Commerce Bulletin Board
ÿSilicon Investor-less
ÿFTC backs data-meister self-policing
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ "IT IS A CONTINUATION of the commission's efforts over the last several years to be aware of technology and to try to address that," said Kristen Geyer, senior counsel in the SEC's office of market supervision.
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿGeyer said SEC staff members hope to issue the guidelines within a month, but they are still only in discussion about the plan. Even so, she said they are not likely to be proposed as formal rules but rather as informal guidance.
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿGeyer told a group of lawyers attending a conference here that SEC officials hope the guidelines would provide "signposts" for firms to help determine if their oversees business conducted on the Internet would fall under the SEC's regulatory oversight.
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿThe SEC is likely to suggest that firms include a prominent disclaimer when they do not intend to conduct business in the United States, she said. The agency will also probably suggest that firms with "passive" Web sites, that do not interact with potential securities customers, would not be subject to federal securities laws.
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿc 1998 Reuter Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuter content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuter.
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿSuharto signs new IMF reform deal
ÿHong Kong slumps, Seoul soars
ÿJudge sharply rebuffs Microsoft
ÿCognizant splits into two companies
ÿAn elephant, and proud of it ....
Now what we have Bill, is a failure to communicate. Cool hand Luke went out in the Desert and took some assays, SFA...did a 50 pound bench test and actually milled some gold; hense found some gold...not anything to indicate that the premise herein is NOT true...there is an anomoly in many desert dirts. Period. If I disclaim properly, maybe I can post a fact like this. This is not an offer to/ blah...A placer Group claimed land that had gold on it...near a Desert Dirt. With a group of fellow investor-friends. So, to say, we collectively agreed in the premise, and the method. We put the word TALK in our research. It was intended as a comliment to all the folks here on the Threads.
This is true and we never posted anywhere about it, but said once we understood the rules, we might. There is a mighty fact devoloping here. That is the fact.
Chucaupt2
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
|
