Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

bruwin

FJB

locogringo

To: Celtictrader who wrote (1087274)	9/9/2018 11:24:16 AM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations of 1583386

On September 7, President Trump mocked Mueller after George Papadopoulos — whom the media had hyped as being the person who would “prove” that Trump had colluded with Russia — was sentenced to a piddly 14 days in jail…for lying to the FBI. View image on Twitter Conservative News@BIZPACReview Trump mocks Mueller for wasting $28 million to sentence Papadopoulos to 14 days in jail t.co 7:57 AM - Sep 8, 2018 11 See Conservative News's other Tweets Twitter Ads info and privacy Legal experts say the miniscule 14-day sentence was a damning indictment of what a colossal waste of time and money Mueller’s investigation has been. Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a liberal who voted for Hillary, said Papadopoulos’s laughably tiny sentence proved Mueller had a weak case. “I thought there was a weakness right away in the beginning because they indicted him for the weakest charge — that is, lying to an FBI agent instead of ‘conspiracy to collude’ or ‘conspiracy to commit some crime’ in relation to Russia,” Dershowitz told Fox & Friends. “Charging somebody with lying to a law enforcement official is usually a signal that they don’t have a strong case against the person. And that’s obviously what happened here,” said Dershowitz, the author of the bestselling book, “The Case Against Impeaching Trump.” Alan Dershowitz also slammed Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren for deluding themselves into thinking they can invoke the 25th Amendment willy-nilly to impeach President Trump simply because they don’t like his brash personality. “You really have to read the 25th Amendment and understand it was never intended to medicalize political differences,” said Dershowitz, an internationally recognized Constitutional Law scholar. “Even President Obama yesterday used the term ‘paranoia.'” Dershowitz further noted: “It’s very dangerous when we try to psychiatricize political differences. That’s not what the 25th Amendment was about. It was about a president who was shot or a president who was having a psychotic break and didn’t know the difference between right and wrong. It was not intended as a substitute for impeachment. And we ought to get off that as soon as possible. Otherwise, we will really, really undercut the important meaning of the 25th Amendment.” DNC says Papadopoulos’ UK contact who claimed he had ‘dirt’ on Hillary may be dead Conservative News Today 8 bizpacreview

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next