SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PNWC - Pacific Norwest Capital

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: snorkel who wrote (84)1/15/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: Rob Ady  Read Replies (3) of 295
 
Snorkel:

Why would 20 people call GR to tell him that? I thought GR/Vescan had nothing to do with this anymore? When you said "He said the company has been telling people wncr has no deal with them." Who is "the company" and who is "them"?

WNCR appears to have gone underground--by that I mean there is nobody to call who represents the company and they have released no news since November. I wonder if the genius who brokered the "limestone deal" planned the PR. They look remarkably similar--NONEXISTENT!!!!

I guess the Texada Island (that is the island discussed on the web page you referred to about the lawsuit--it seems logical as the limestone site but I guess that has not been released/public) is approx 30 miles long and 7-8 miles wide. I guess that means there could be multiple companies and mineral claims on the island. The Pacific Rim interests on their web page appear to be primarily focused on gold and precious metals and not limestone. I am not sure what that means other than they do not appear to be focusing on the limestone that is on the island. I would love to know the company who has the claim for which WNCR "has the rights to" for sales and production. Then we could call them.

The price speaks volumes to me regardless of what we talk about here. It seem odd that a company with the rights to a large resource of limestone would announce any positive news they had before their stock went to zero. They have sat by and observed the decline from $2 without announcing a thing to inform investors. There also used to be relatively few shares trade of this "tightly held" company. We know that is not the case anymore with the volumes we have seen. Who would sell at these prices--there are few people with shares this cheap.

Rob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext