Nanoviricides - The Other Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Nanoviricides - The Other Board

NNVC 1.960

+18.1%

9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Its_lose_not_loose who wrote (956)	10/3/2018 12:41:18 PM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) of 1010

True, UberSap has many commonalities with Spaz, but there are differences. Consider their histories: - Ubersap has been around on the SMBs for twenty or so years, repeatedly doing the exact same dance over and over for a string of scams. He has all the features of a repeat-victim who's not very smart and a bit of a nut-job. His paranoid delusional gibbering over the past few years reflects his progressive dementia. - Spaz appeared in 2010 as a fully baked shill, with an alias from day-1 that's clearly a nod to Seymour. She spent a couple of months playing the game of posting on some other boards, until one day announcing she's "off the fence", and "been silently reading the board for a month". Then quickly stepping up to be the most dedicated MSB enforcer and incessant shill. Stereotypical operative. - Both UberSap and Spaz claimed to be on Seymour's speed-dial insider pipeline. Spaz, in her numerous claims of touring the facilities and of having "just had a phone conversation with Seymour", and the rest, showed a much more involved relationship. It's certainly possible that Spaz could just be a volunteer sap like UberSap. But her alias right from her inception on IHUB? The work that would have went into writing Seeking Alpha articles, if she wasn't just the front-person posting them for Seymour. Just seems too much when everything is considered together. I'm guessing it's one of those mysteries we'll never definitively solve unless the SEC investigates, which doesn't look likely.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next