Not only that, one should not base his views on newspaper headlines.
I agree for the most part. Does this relate to the headlines from bleeding heart new sources?
And all the bleeding hearts socialists of the Süddeutsche Zeitung, El Pais, the NYT, The Guardian, The Economist and its sister paper the FT, can write whatever they want, but we will do the right thing tomorrow.
I can only assume you support Bolsonaro. He wins with 55.2%.
Should I take him at his words:
- The Military Police should have killed 1,000 rather than 111 prisoners in the Carandiru massacre.
- Pinochet should have killed more people.
- I'm in favor of torture. You know that. And the people are too. Through the vote, you'll change nothing in this country. Nothing, absolutely nothing. We'll only get change, unfortunately, when we go into a civil war here someday and do a work the military regime didn't do, killing as much as thirty thousand people, starting with FHC. It's all right if some innocent people die. Innocent people die in many wars.
- There is no doubt. I would launch a coup on the same day. [Congress] doesn't work and I'm sure that at least 90% of the population would applaud. Congress nowadays does nothing; it votes only for what the president wants. If he's who rules, who decides and who gloats above the Congress, then let the coup be launched, let it be a dictatorship.
- It's my advice and I do it: I evade all the taxes I can.
- I never hit my ex-wife. But many times I wanted to shoot her.
en.wikiquote.org
I can see why you might think all those newspapers are bleeding hearts.
Are you generally happy? |
