SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 398.52-4.4%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (144188)11/8/2018 5:27:47 PM
From: carranza24 Recommendations

Recommended By
dvdw©
ggersh
marcher
Reilly Diefenbach

  Read Replies (1) of 218800
 
I must be completely INTJish because it seems useless to ascribe motives, personalities, etc., to corporations that simply wish to maximize profits however they deem appropriate to do so.

Thus, I see no difference between Apple, Windows, QCOM, etc., except in how efficiently or creatively they execute their plans to make money.

To make money, these behemoths must fill a need. They all do. To some extent.

I have a hard time cheering for any of them.

I remember when Google’s corporate motto was something taken from the Hippocratic oath: do no evil.

Now, it might be as evil as they come.

But they still fill a need, and definitely make money.

It’s hugely amusing to see a multinational corporation involved in brutal competition suggest that it is some sort of Social Justice Warrior.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News