SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Triffin who wrote (1100832)11/20/2018 5:56:46 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) of 1584566
 
Now that’s fuzzy math... first of all the 76 cents per kWh is the price the energy was purchased at and energy rates tend to spike during peak loading. Coal is poor at handling peak loading as you can’t readily bring in new generation units to handle the spikes. Secondly, currently the cost of wind turbines is of the order of 7 cents per kWh. Thirdly, the cost of coal generation does not include the external damage to health and environment (global warming, heavy metals, ozone, particulates etc.). If these were factored in (like they did with tobacco), it would not be competitive. Coal like other poisonous chemicals - lead in paint, gasoline, DDT etc., needs to be banned. But now we have a pro-pollution scorched earth fake president...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext