Can the Sept 30th statement by ZEN saying they have adequate insurance against the initial claim, which was a claim of severance and wages continue to be true if the claim is no longer a lawsuit about wages and severance HooterHanna? Just curious if this falls into the same category as ;
petri dish claims of ease of purifying which went on, in-perpetuity .
So my question is, you have responded to people on this board that ask about adequate insurance
" are you saying the company is lying" ,when in fact it would "appear" from the conversation here that insurance for defending against a severance claim is a different insurance from other claims that may or may not occur which are being discussed here?
I am asking, I am presupposing nothing, just challenging the prospective that if the lawsuit changed from the Sep 30 statement, you suggest that another in-perpetuity now exists, that may be the case but should not be assumed, capiche?
PS I do not make libelous comments, what I do is use evidence to subscribe to theories, based on that evidence. The theories are normally middle of the road, not, $176,000 a share nor, Zero a share in everything I do. |
