SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Zentek Ltd.
ZEN.V 1.130-3.4%9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: muskavite who wrote (17464)12/3/2018 12:37:34 PM
From: Wayverider18 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bentonstocks
Bills16
gunzo
Josephus
Mister D

and 3 more members

  Read Replies (2) of 53945
 
Question: Why would Zen invest $40,000 annually to use a site as a communication platform that essentially serves as an open discussion forum for and against Zen's business plan?

The issue related to this question is especially underscored by Larry Hoover's more recent post. Consider, we know that Zen is a company that for various reasons brings out the worst in bashers: whose carefully deliberated, extremely time consuming posts appear soooo vengefully driven that any sane reader would question the poster's mental well bring (e.g. posters not being invested in a stock but setting aside a large portion of their live's everyday to attack it). We know Hoov is the 2nd, or arguably 3rd biggest pariah in the Zen community. I personally go to Agoracom once every 2-3 weeks to do some back reading of Zen related posts in case there are points that have not been raised here. But I have no interest in participating in a community forum in which such a maligned individual as Hoov, whose words are excessively infected with anger and the desire for retaliatory measures, still carries a respected voice on the site.

At least here he has been banned from participation on some discussion boards and has to stoop so low as to misrepresent his true identity on others. Using Agoracom as a platform for $40,000 is a little perplexing to me. I agree with Rennie - its not a lot of money in the big scheme of things but it could be better spent elsewhere, and without inviting equal billing to the stance of excessively deranged bashing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News