SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A New Age In Gold Refining

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael J. Wendell who wrote (459)1/16/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) of 672
 
Michael, what you say is true about the costs being high for some special situations. Most of the time you can get to the best precision by careful addition of some known amount of metal into a sample that has been split, so you then assay both splits and see how much of your added metal shows up. So if you assay a sample and get 6 grams per ton, and then you add another 6 grams per ton to some more and you then get 9 grams per ton, you know you are missing 50% due to masking effects, and the real assay should be 12 grams per ton. Keep the additions in the range of what you are assaying. Do not add 1000 grams per ton, or you will bury your result in that high value.
This can be done, but it costs.
I am ever curious if there is really metal in theose dirts??

Any assay must be fine tuned to what they are assaying as native ores are so variable that it is rarae to find a universal assay for any metal in any ore.

Bill
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext