SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1104445)12/14/2018 1:24:56 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 1586591
 

US Steel Stocks Have Dropped 57% Since Trump Instituted Steel Tariffs



by JakeThomas

U.S. steel company stocks have not performed as President Trump might have expected following his tariff implementation.

Despite President Donald Trump’s efforts to prop up American steel companies with tariffs, steel company stocks are down, with U.S. Steel seeing a 57 percent drop since Trump’s tariffs were announced in March.

Via Reason:

As Charlie Bilello, director of research for New York-based Pension Partners, pointed out on Twitter this week, U.S. Steel's stock price has collapsed by more than 50 percent since early March, when Trump announced plans to place new taxes on imported steel. Since the tariffs were officially implemented on June 1, U.S. Steel has seen its stock price fall from $37 to less than $21 at noon on Wednesday. The current price represents a 17-month low.

View image on Twitter




Charlie Bilello
?@charliebilello

US Steel closed at a 17-month low, down 57% since the Tariff announcement back on March 1st. $X

While Trump’s trade moves are just one factor involved in stock prices, the steep fall off casts doubt on whether the president’s tariffs can produce the results he has promised:

Still, the dramatic fall of U.S. Steel's value in the eyes of investors raises questions about the benefits of Trump's attempt to boost American steelmakers at the expense of America's steel-consuming industries, which are forced to pay higher prices due to tariffs.

In other words, if Trump...believes it is necessary to force automakers like Ford to pay $1 billion annuallyin tariff-related costs in order to benefit American steelmakers, shouldn't the benefits of that policy outweigh the costs?

America’s top five steel producers have all seen their stock prices fall, Reason noted.

"Of the 13 stocks in the S&P 1500 steel sub index, all but one are down year to date by an average of nearly 25 percent," Barron's notes this week, adding that the real problem facing all these companies is that "steel is very much a global market. The U.S. is 'short' steel. Even with domestic mills running at about 80% of capacity the U.S. needs to import about 30 million tons of steel."

Part of the problem is that American companies have to import steel — the U.S. simply doesn’t produce enough on its own to meet the demand.

Trump has claimed his trade policy is fueling several new steel plants across the U.S., but the facts do not bear out such a claim.

Despite Trump's repeated assertions (which have now earned him a "bottomless Pinocchio" from The Washington Post's fact-checkers), there are not seven or eight new steel plants being built across the country. There's not even one—unless you count U.S. Steel making some upgrades to its main facility in Gary, Indiana, but that's hardly what Trump claimed the tariffs would accomplish.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext