Well, good, may the games begin once again. Yes, Chris, theologian, judger of mankind for Jesus Christ, and abritrator of who God loves and who he doesn't, would you please answer ALAN IN EXPLICIT DETAIL. You treat this man as if he came here as a blasphemer and a hater of God, and obviously from an occult environment. Alan,
And do not give your appraisals please based upon interpretations of Paul. Paul did not die for Alan or you or me. And we were not instructed to go forth with the epistles of Paul, but the good news that Jesus Christ was the son of God and the rest, based on what Jesus himself said.
I challenge you to judge Alan from the mouth of Jesus Christ as written in the Gospels as an enemy of Christ, one to be beaten away with excerpts from Paul..
The words of Jesus--I had to edit out some fleshly stuff there-- is the Gospel we are obligated to give people. Not the writings of Paul, not the writings of John. What did Jesus CHrist command in his own words before He died, or after his return where literally he visited around for many days. Pull me out where Alan is not fit for the Kingdom of Heaven please.
And I'm telling you, don't you post one word of Paul, because you will be giving another gospel of your interpretation of PAUL. I'm saying where in the gospel once given to the world do you judge Alan unfit for Heaven. And I mean keep it to Jesus. He is my Lord and Savior, He died for me. I use Paul irregularly, and heed Peter's warning in the last 2 paragraphs of Peter II where he warns people way back then to watch out because a LOT of people were twisting Paul's words around. First of all, he sure was wordy, and I know here there is not foolishness wanting in much words. There is no foolishness in Paul, but Peter sure warns about him, and that is the only warning about scripture in the whole Bible except John telling people TO LEAVE REVELATIONS ALONE AND DON'T GO MESSING WITH IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T THINK JOHN REALLY MEANT THIS AND THAT.
Yes, I'm shouting. Be glad and rejoice I'm not in your house right now. If I'm that deceived myself and need a new Lord, you'd better clue me in because right now I'm rather remarkably happy with the one I've had for a whole lot of years now, where he saw me through the good, the bad and the very ugly, both within my beloved church setting and in the world I found so pleasant as a momentary alternative which led to about 10 years away from where I should have been.
You want to speak for God, one thing I've found, it is wise to be perfectly on the mark in every last detail if you do. You have judged and banished Alan, and Nancy went with him obviously, with some of your own understanding of a man you don't know, and mostly based on jumping in late in Emile's interpretations of what Alan thinks only in line with the epistles of Paul. Sorry too darn far down the food chain for me, and too much human mind getting in there. So please use your own words and based on Jesus judge him and myself included please. |
