Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment

NRG 149.47

-6.6%

Dec 17 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1201)	12/29/2018 9:49:39 PM
From: Doug R	2 Recommendations Recommended By 3bar Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) of 6355

Hawk, There are full reversals and partial excursions. From all that I have read on the subject, it's the partial excursions that occur every 12,000 years. I would think that a full reversal would hit during one of those events so would fall on a 12,000 year marker. Partial excursions come in a range of extremity. It does smack of overstatement to characterize partial excursions as reversals but that's one of those details to pin down. Thanks for bringing it up. It's also a bit misleading for the mainstream to omit the partial excursion data and focus only on full reversals. For example there is what is referred to as the Mono Lake "reversal" of approx 23,000 yrs ago. agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com The Laschamp is said to be dated "around 40,000 years ago". I do not know what +/- error is associated with that bit it could conceivably be 10%. So a +/- 10% applied to Mono Lake and Laschamp could put them both "on cycle". Dating of these things is not as precise as you or I would like. Another detail to pin down.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next