SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ryanaka who wrote (1108915)1/8/2019 12:36:53 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) of 1580690
 
Interesting. So you would argue that Ivar Griever is not qualified to talk about temperature ?

nobelprize.org

or that John Coleman does not qualify to talk about global temperature and weather (largely self taught in Science but was accepted into Meteorological Society) ? Here is one of the stills






Look at the plot of all the models and look at the plot of the actual temperatures. Notice anything ?

Sorry, I don't go with the "Emperor has new clothes" fairly tale about scientists. That only special gifted people can see the wonderous science and us plebs have to listen to the words of wisdom they offer. John Coleman recounts the history of what happened with global warming from the skeptics viewpoint. If you have nothing to say (i.e didn't watch it) your view wont be changing my POV much at all. If scientists have a job, get paid to do a certain function, that job will get done. At the moment criminal organisations like Deutsche Bank want to see some impressive Global Warming Science, and have coughed up the dough to get it.

See your Reference to "Pseudoscience". That is exactly what Ivor Griever and John Coleman called the recent Climate Science, and that was a compliment. It's really a new religion. No dissenters allowed. Shrinking strawberries and all.

I didn't come here with just one view on this matter. In previous years I would argue with Thomas Watson on the possibility of a Global Warming Trend and the reports in the press. I do science though, and I would be rather be mistaken and corrected then belong to a new Religion that is also called "Science". When I hear some twat on TV or in the Press start using the "consensus" words, or the "97% of scientists say" it makes me want to puke. The 97% is misused term usually as well. It's exactly like the picture of the doctor smoking a cigarette in my previous post. Einstein didn't discover Relativity because he had a consensus view. It isn't just him if you check the history on science.

It wasnt just JFK who said it.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News