SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 368.31+0.6%Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (145202)1/9/2019 11:03:28 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) of 217639
 
re <<Operation Red Sea ... But shows China encroaching on another US specialty. And doing it very well :))>>

operation red sea is perhaps too low tech



i do however note that team china humvee costs 2/3 less than the usa version

interesting that the bigger boyz keep escalating one-up presumably to get funding and edge

the little fellows shall certainly get left behind, and may eventually to be practical and opt out

from team usa insisting on sailing carriers through the china / china-taiwan strait for 70 years (1949 - 2019) in supposed provocation, to team china building islands and innovating anti-ship this, and sub-surface that, in presumed response to meet safety imperative, we this day receive long anticipated news that df-26 is deployed even as the deployment happened last april

explanation of how the perhaps gadget works,



simulation of how it allegedly works



am imagining that team china shall barely comment on britain's trial-announced intention to re-establish asia naval base and putting UK treasure to deemed-wise use

the missiles are inexpensive, easy to increase in numbers and not-difficult to extend range

let us see which busy-body navy wishes to be clinical test subject, and

let's watch & brief on the levelling of playing field

i have no doubt at all that the world is evolving to be a safer place per NRA logic

japantimes.co.jp

Beijing announces deployment of 'carrier killer' missile after U.S. warship sails near South China Sea islets
Jan 10, 2019
Beijing has announced that its so-called carrier killer anti-ship missile has been deployed to the country’s northwest, just a day after the U.S. Navy sailed a warship past disputed islands in the South China Sea.

China’s DF-26 ballistic missile, which reportedly has a range of 3,000-4,000 km, was mobilized to the country’s northwest plateau and desert areas, the state-run Global Times newspaper reported Tuesday, quoting national broadcaster CCTV.

While the actual deployment date was not mentioned, the timing of the reports’ release coincided with a U.S. “freedom of navigation” operation (FONOP) near Chinese-held islands in the South China Sea’s Paracel chain on Monday. In the FONOP, which Washington conducts globally to challenge maritime claims it considers excessive, the U.S. Navy sent the Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture-based USS McCampbell guided-missile destroyer near the islands — a move China blasted as a “provocation.”

The Global Times report alluded to the U.S. operation, quoting an unidentified expert as noting that the deployment “is a good reminder that China is capable of safeguarding its territory.”

“Even when launched from deeper inland areas of China, the DF-26 has a range far-reaching enough to cover the South China Sea,” the expert added.

Beijing has constructed a series of military outposts throughout the waterway, which includes vital sea lanes through which about $3 trillion in global trade passes each year. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei have overlapping claims in the South China Sea, where the U.S., Chinese, Japanese and some Southeast Asian navies also operate.

The newspaper called the DF-26 a “new generation of intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of targeting medium and large ships at sea.” According to the Pentagon’s 2018 report on Chinese military power, the road-mobile missile, first fielded in 2016, “is capable of conducting conventional and nuclear precision strikes against ground targets and conventional strikes against naval targets in the western Pacific and Indian Oceans and the South China Sea.”

China’s Defense Ministry announced that the missile had been officially deployed last April, and CCTV said Tuesday that weapons “are now capable of mobile operations across the country.”

Experts say a mobile missile launch from deep inside China’s interior would be more difficult to intercept than a launch from an area closer to the shore. This is because in the initial launch phase, the missile is relatively slow and easy to detect, making it a ripe target for enemy anti-missile strikes. After the launch enters its later stages, the missile’s speed is so fast that the chances of interception dwindle significantly.

This missile’s deployment has also stoked concern in Japan, home to a number of key U.S. military bases.

According to a June 2017 report published by the Center for a New American Security think tank, while the United States’ main focus on the DF-26 has been aircraft carriers, the missile also bolsters China’s ability to target and destroy U.S. bases in the region — a capability experts say remains an underappreciated challenge.

“The greatest military threat to U.S. vital interests in Asia may be one that has received somewhat less attention: the growing capability of China’s missile forces to threaten U.S. bases in the region,” the report said.

In it, the two authors, Thomas Shugart and Javier Gonzalez, simulated a preemptive Chinese attack on U.S. bases in Japan. They found the results would be devastating, including “almost every major fixed headquarters and logistical facility being struck” and “almost every U.S. ship in port in Japan struck pierside by ballistic missiles.” The simulation also found that most of the military runways would be cratered in the attack, effectively clipping the wings of the U.S. Air Force in Japan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext