Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sdgla who wrote (1109760)	1/11/2019 10:28:53 PM
From: ryanaka	Read Replies (2) of 1571799

Read more carefully. The point was, no one (of the general public) can judge the scientific results directly, and everyone should carefully discern who to listen to, namely the climate scientists and their consensus. Climate science is science. So, you should listen to the scientific consensus, not to the crackpot experts, pseudoscientists, the disinformation propaganda specialists, or the politicians or populists catering to what you want to hear rather than telling facts as they are. Climate change is a problem that can decide life or death matter to humanity. Runaway climate change can end the planet. It can only be addressed with political will. The current problem of climate change debate is the failure to separate the above two. Climate change is not a matter of public debate. It is science and the conclusion should be scientifically sound. The climate change projection, going forward, such as RCP8.5 falls in the domain of the climate scientists, not of the politicians or disinformation propagandists. Your debate is mute when you can't distinguish the above two.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next