SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1109844)1/12/2019 6:19:31 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) of 1571405
 
The cave bears.

4 mins in to 10 minutes here.
fod.infobase.com

(if you can see it, BBC documentary)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moving on...

Regarding water vapour. What do you find hard understanding about the CO2 and H20 absorption spectra?

Water vapour is way more powerful then CO2 as a greenhouse gas. This is multiplied more as an interaction when clouds form. Particles and aerosols will be seed points for water droplets to form, so they would be part of that interaction effect.

Here is Thomas Watsons post again. Do you understand why and how he makes his calculations?

Message 31964999

you can find the same IR profiles in this paper I have mentioned several times here.

control.isy.liu.se

see page 21, the IR profiles of H2O and CO2, they are the same (or very nearly the same) profile as in the graph shown in Thomas Watsons diagrams.

and... once again if you missed it. The cloud cover versus the reflected IR power during the night shown earlier here.



Why don't you believe the data? Do you see that the reflected energy is dependent on the (H2O) cloud cover or what?? See cloud cover symbols under the "X" axis.

e-education.psu.edu

It's unlikely to think nearly all increased global warming is caused by just increased CO2 levels.

There are literally dozens of other valid possible contributors.

The proposition just is not reasonable with the known facts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext