OK.
Final clarification statement with question.
(xiii) Are you interested in helping the human race maintain the planet Earth, with all it's wonderful fauna and flora, habitable for our offspring in the future ?
i.e. what is more important here, winning an argument that has some political component, or finding out climate wise what is important and what is not important. I am asking this question of you, but I am interested really how the rest of humanity reacts to revealing new information as well. A lot of the information has been around for a while, but the IPCC [The church of CO2] have deemed the information inappropriate and have requested it to be withdrawn.
Seemingly when Kepler et al came out with the model that the planets all orbit around the sun, rather then the very complicated gyrations needed for the sun and all the planets to orbit the Earth, it was 16 years before the new simpler model was adopted. It certainly took a while for the penny to drop.
Oddly enough, some of the peculiar results in physics still attract and Earth central type of result, possibly grounds for some new theories, but for all practicalities for today, the Heliocentric model of the solar system is the one in everyday use today.
So for sixteen years, in the light of new knowledge, this is still how everyone thought...
youtube.com
as opposed to this...
youtube.com
well, maybe this is more accurate now we know a little more today?
youtube.com
If you are going to be stuck to your geocentric view of Climate change, not only a geocentric view of climate change, but one where Earth, our lives, all spin around Carbon Dioxide and essentially some fat bankers who like to control the prices of fossil fuels and make international laws to suit themselves.
i.e the CO2 centric view of global climate change...
Prepare to be challenged... |
