SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1110385)1/14/2019 1:06:50 PM
From: maceng21 Recommendation

Recommended By
isopatch

  Read Replies (2) of 1571023
 
OK, so using your link here, and the ink demonstration....

skepticalscience.com

Why didn't he use another ink component, say red ink to show the very effective IR absorber called water vapour. Why do all these climate scientists just ignore water vapour? It's beyond f**king wierd. It like clouds and water vapour just don't exist.

I understand first order interactions, that is where small concentrations of a material can have a big effect. An example of this would a be the presence of a catalyst. I have studied the data, the only "catalyst" we could consider would be small particles or aerosols in cloud formation.

.... oh he used the "blanket" word btw .... According my earlier metrology 101 post we are not supposed to use the "blanket" word... it's a space heater. -g-

e-education.psu.edu


and this is the kicker. The evidence plainly shows that cloud cover NOT global warming is more effected by incident cosmic radiation then temperature.



science.sciencemag.org

Did you miss this one shown in a previous link...

notrickszone.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext