SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Land Shark who wrote (1110412)1/14/2019 2:02:03 PM
From: maceng21 Recommendation

Recommended By
isopatch

  Read Replies (1) of 1570794
 
You are missing my point. I am not going to try and say there is a correlation between
cosmic rays and average global temperature for either clouds, water vapour, or CO2.
Other variables (I will show) will swamp it.

On an immediate basis I have shown simple experiments... real temperature (or incident power)
measurement vary with cloud cover. That has been shown, can be replicated, and everyone who reads this
can do the cloudy evening versus clear evening experiment using their own flesh as the sensor.

The point here is that CO2 is a minor player in a situation where water vapour plays a major role but the average results of time are minimal.

To infer the temperature of the planet is being increases or decreased by CO2 is unproven in all respects.

It's plain bonkers imho.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News