I think Fred Palmer is an excellent case to choose as an example.
There is no doubt the guy is a sleaze, only had self interest at heart, and was willing to do anything to keep "The Divine Plan" working that is coal being shipped and burned. No doubt in my mind at all.
Look what happened though. We stopped burning coal and btw that was part of the devils plans for sure. The Rockafellas and a few others involved in the Oil biz had a competitor in coal, and were keen to have them seen off.
Still looking at what happened, guess what ? All that particulate laden, SO2 laden, coal burning smoke disappeared. The French were not too happy as the flavour of the grapes changed. The air became clearer (as we have already discussed) and the global cooling caused by (smog creating) coal burning STOPPED.
So by interfering with Gods Plan, and making a martyr of his agent on Earth [Fred Palmer], we killed coal and caused global warming. Have you no shame? OK neither do I really. Coal killed a lot of people in the UK and the change was good. The UK's acid rain caused havoc on the continent. Fair enough I am a Brexiteer, but I don't wish to ruin the trees in Germany, the fish in Norway, and all the other problems associated with acid (SO2 laden) rain. Really we love the Continentals, even though there have been a few disagreements over the centuries.
Now, the question remains, how have genuine Scientists and individuals been treated by the GW crowd who are not of the same view regarding AGW? They should be welcomed as the process to advance the science advanced. They are not welcomed and I am fairly sure why. They disagreed with "policy". It's because of the people bankrolling the process, and if you look with open eyes, I think you might moderate your view. Maybe not overnight, but as you gradually realize the intention of the critics of AGW are honest and good rather then bad as you currently think.
Corbett once again. Look in at about minute 32. The IPCC limited the scope of the report, eliminating factors like the the Sun, and then forced researchers to accept what is allowable to report on.
Listen to the "Summary for policy makers" scam.
No way can this be accepted as legitimate scientific enquiry.
Enron was in on all this. That should make you wary even if nothing else on outright FRAUD.
You need to realize the bankers who are running all this are only interested in the science that prove their narrative. I have said this before and it looks clearly to be the case from where I am sitting.
youtu.be |
