Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1110724)	1/15/2019 8:56:49 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) of 1572580

You haven't wasted any time on me. If you right about AGW, it is not a problem at all. My eyes are open, I will see the facts eventually. Not a second wasted. Others attracted to the "deniers" argument will read your wise words and find the path to enlightenment. If you are wrong on AGW. you have wasted even less time. You pointed out the facts as you saw them, I pointed out the facts as I saw them. My principle fact is the IPCC used procedure and protocol to eliminate all valid discussion regarding factors like the sun (kinda important that one in my book) and only look at causes like CO2. That is pure bs as I see it. In the second case, your efforts would be even more useful to you. These threads are here to exchange ideas ... far as i know. I could do lots of other stuff more important, but I am curious about what is correct in the Climate Change debate. I consider the time and effort well worth the investment. I would not have discovered even half the most interesting stuff had I not engaged in the discussion. Reference: Coal consumption. We Europeans did an OK job. The Chinese like their coal, looks like.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next