[Off topic]Hi TG - you must have missed al's post to me. ;-) Message 3194774
I took it up with him off line. I really don't want to get into it about Ron because he's not responded to me, as I requested, and I believe that shows some decent behaviour. As far as al goes, I was as non-plussed as you as to the postings last night. I hope he's off just because he's embarrased, I fear the worst though. I will give benefit of the doubt to those holding as people posting negative comments about those holding will always elicit a negative response. In other words, it's not tiresome, but understandable. Are you asking me if it's right? I don't think so, again, it's understandable. If the comments were held to the stock itself, and not the people who hold it, I think this board would be a lot more friendly. The worst type of comments are the subtle innuendo and claims that some of the folks holding are hyping, criminal, etc., when accusations like these are put out for everyone to see, and they're not true, it can bring folks to the boiling point. JMHO. |
