SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim black who wrote (1706)1/18/1998 10:55:00 PM
From: Reagan DuBose  Read Replies (1) of 10852
 
***Off topic response to query***

Jim, my personal semi-solution to the ISP access bandwidth problem was to install home ISDN service. PacBell provides the ISDN line, and I can dial-up any one of several ISPs who provide ISDN access. At present I use GTE, and find their service satisfactory ($39.95/mo for unlimited access). Never get a busy signal, and email service is fine. No editorial content, but I only want internet access anyway.

ISDN is a bit of a pain to install and configure, and costs a bit more, but is affordable and available now. If only one bearer channel is used, access is at 64K bits per second. If two channels are used, 128K bits/second is the speed. I find the 64K to be not much slower than the 128K, as the local-server-to-my-home link is usually not the bottleneck in the system. Also, if the second 64K channel is not used for internet, it is available as an extra telephone line (even while I am using the other channel for internet access), which I find useful for fax and/or voice.

Of course, some day (real soon now) inexpensive higher bandwidth will be common; perhaps ATM or cable, or satellite. Until then, I think ISDN is not a bad choice.

Reagan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext