2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.35

+0.7%

Nov 18 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

dvdw©

To: TobagoJack who wrote (145871)	2/6/2019 9:29:08 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation of 217868

Charles Duan should explain how it is that the alleged monopolist Qualcomm has a tiny market capitalisation compared with the total of the poor brutalized behemoths Apple, Intel, Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi, ZTE, Nvidia at al which add up to a few $trillion compared with Qualcomm's less than $100 billion. Normally a monopolist gets to charge the big bucks and the customers pay as required. Qualcomm would be 10x bigger than Apple rather than a tenth the size of it. He says there shouldn't be quibbling over royalties. I agree. Qualcomm's derisory royalties should be paid and appreciative thanks offered too. I would have charged at least 16% royalty as for the GSM cartel, not 3% which is ridiculously low. 1% per patent is normally considered a reasonable price. Qualcomm provides thousands of patents and has enabled the biggest thing in not just human but biological history. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next