SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : NNVC - NanoViricides, Inc.
NNVC 1.205-2.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Straynut2/16/2019 11:15:09 AM
1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Savant

   of 12873
 
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:01 AM

Anil,

I'm resending this email of December 1, 2018, the day following the Annual Meeting, to remind you that should you EVER convince your "toadies" on the Board to act as your counterparties and repurchase the Shingles drug from TheraCour, I want the PR to clearly state the cost in dollars spent by the Company. Let us witness the magnitude of this "THEFT BY DECEPTION" from your own shareholders by none other than The Acting CEO, President, and Board Chairman. IT DOESN'T HAPPEN EVERY DAY, so it's worth recording for its uniqueness.

My gut tells me you intend to consummate your fraud very soon, perhaps even as early as next Tuesday.

I can't wait to find out if you can "pull it off" after over 13+ years of scheming as to how and when to do it.

You should be so proud of yourself if you succeed.

Good luck!

Dianne B
Dave Morse

The Whistleblower Team at NanoViricides, Inc. (NNVC)
Filed with the SEC on November 17, 2018



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: We're Playing a Real-Life Game Of Chess
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 16:08:31 -0500

Anil,

Whereas we believe you are about to do your scheming best to rip off your shareholders by lumping the remaining herpesvirus indications together in one sale to hide the fact that you are fraudulently reselling Shingles, I am hereby demanding on their behalf that Nano receives an ITEMIZED BILL, SHOWING THE VALUE ATTACHED TO EACH OF THE VIRUSES AS A SEPARATE LINE ITEM.

At the meeting yesterday, when I asked you to justify the sale of virus targets on February 15, 2010, that included Ocular Herpes. even though its causative agents (HSV-1 and HSV-2) were already owned, thereby giving Nano ownership of Ocular Herpes as well, you breezily stated that I was right. You then tried to argue that the 2 million Series A Preferred shares should not be reduced by 20% (there being 5 items listed in the license) because you had in a memo coincident with the sale accorded that indication NO VALUE, THAT IT WAS SIMPLY STATED FOR CLARITY. PURE B.S.!!!

I HEREBY DEMAND YOU SEND A COPY OF THAT MEMO TO ME ASAP, and not a made-up forgery. It is an example of your conniving ways!

To counter you using that ploy, if you dare to play that same game in your upcoming PR, I again checkmate you ------ asking that the BOD go on record by VOTING FOR EACH LINE-ITEM SEPARATELY, together with the value assigned by Dr Myers to each, so that if we see that you have manipulated them to commit a BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY on your behalf, they will be held accountable in the forthcoming class-action lawsuit I hope to persuade the SEC to file, which will also embrace all of your corruption starting with the Exclusive License Agreement of May 12, 2005, which Peter told me yesterday, to my utter amazement, DID NOT EXIST. Presumably, he is arguing that the AMENDED License Agreement of September 1, 2005 was the first. (I can't wait for him to explain the word "AMENDED" in court).

I'M AFRAID TO SAY THIS, BUT YOU CONTINUE TO CORRUPT ALL THOSE AROUND YOU IN YOUR WEB OF FRAUD.

THE TRUTH CANNOT BE DENIED

Dianne and Dave

P.S. I will address Peter's (the Company SEC counsel) claims that the word "Herpes", found in this non-existent license, does include Shingles in its definition, as well as provide evidence found in the Company Annual Reports to refute his assertion that the Exclusive License Agreement of May 12, 2005 somehow never existed.

We believe he made these absurd remarks to buy time to commit the further fraud that we outline above, to create a fait accompli.

As in chess, we like to anticipate your next move BEFORE you make it, so that we can again put you in a position from which you cannot move without committing further fraud.




Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext