International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (29979)	1/19/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Gerald, your bogged down with the little picture. Look at the big one. >> A million bucks better off, with $600,000 of that while in default of another loan.<< Give us a break. If it had been illegal, everybody would be in basement. Have youever thought about the possiblity that the investment facilitated one by someone else in IPM? Maybe it's even a great basement. Are you sure that the $250K is not in dispute. Give us a break. At best, you are taking everything out of context. That's OK, but it results in only your opinion. Quit trying to shove it up everybodys nose. BTW, is the loan securred? How do you know? >> A failure of such negotiations could have a negative effect on the liquidity and capital resources of the Company. << >> A failure of such negotiations could have a negative effect on the liquidity and capital resources of the Company. << $250K is going to have a big effect on IPM? Give me a break. Gerald, no offense met, but are you in business or more of a geologist, engineer, etc. $250K is nothing and a million isn't much more when you are focusing on 3 or 4 bil. minimum in PMs. You are focusing on that, are you not?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next