SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1121070)2/28/2019 4:35:54 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (3) of 1575512
 
In our system of justice, one must have proof of crimes to be convicted. Cohen's testimony was full of speculative talk, a lot of lies, and a lot of victim mentality. What it did not contain was any hard evidence, other than a check. The check written by Trump is the most interesting thing said, because it very well may have been a campaign finance violation. We know Cohen plead guilty to that and Cohen produced a check from Trump. That is the only hard evidence I see. However, there is no Russia Collusion.

This is funny. All along, I've said that Democrats should go after Trump for his women, if they really wanted to find any crimes that might exist, but that Russia collusion was just a big distraction. Turns out I was right. If they are going to find something, it will be related to his women and that check is the only hard piece of evidence I've seen in 2 years of Mueller and Democratic non-sense.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News