| | | Expansion followed by contraction? Like clock work. But what has changed, if anything?
If we can pretend Trump was president for the last 40 years, how would the American economic cycle look like? Different or the same? Would the fluctuation of the economy between periods of expansion and contraction be similar to our present day cycles? Would it throw a giant monkey wrench into the sequence?
How would reshaping American governance have on our economy? what implications it would cast on our present day economic forecasting.?
In your life time, have you ever witnessed 7 trillion dollars come back to America?
You ever wondered why Trump, just an human being, was able to accomplish so many things in a relatively short time? Especially in the economic front.
Trump has disabled the tools of economic suppression, and has turned present day economic forecasting on its heels and undependable, if they were dependable in the first place.
I submit, our present day systems of methods of predicting recessions must be altered to reflect the gross changes on how we are managing our economy today. I think we can all agree, at the very least, its different from what we have been accustomed to. IMO and most importantly, the economic moves coming out from the oval office today are based on entirely different motives, which in turn is revolutionary.
To sum it up, we have a CEO not a politician, with different motives, as President, modeling economic policies. That should carry a large weight into any visionary economic conjecture. |
|
