SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only!
AMD 217.53+1.5%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (3962)1/19/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar  Read Replies (3) of 6843
 
John,

Just when I thought it was safe to go back in the water, I found the following on page 104 of the Jan 20 issue of PC Magazine:

"Though slightly faster than the current version of Tillamook (233 Mhz), the mobile K6, manufactured on AMD's 0.25-micron process, is neither as small nor as cool. With a 2.1 volt core and 3.3 volt I/O (Tillamook uses a 1.8/2.5 volt design), the chip's 266 MHz version has a power dissipation of roughly 8 watts, alevel similar to that of past mobile Pentiums but well above the 233 MHz Tillamook chip's 3.9 watts.

In informal testing, PC Labs found the mobile K6's CPUmark32 scores to be above the average for the tested Tillamook, as would be expected at the faster clock speed. With its original drivers, however, it couldn't complete our Business Winstone 98 tests. With replaced drivers, the unit had a BusinessWinstone 98 score lower than those of most 233 MHz Tillamook units. Repeated test runs resulted in decreasing scores caused by CPU slowdowns, which may indicate heat problems."

Now, maybe this thread has already discussed/dismissed this (as the next issue of PC Mag is already out), but it's news to me and scares the hell out of me.

Pravin.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext