SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Rational Analyst

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott H. Davis who wrote (250)1/20/1998 12:07:00 AM
From: HeyRainier  Read Replies (1) of 1720
 
[ Trendlines ]

Scott, your trendline was drawn correctly. In EK's case, there is no way to connect the line from the highest high to the lowest high immediately preceding the lowest low without the line crossing through the price bars.. Very often you can't. What needs to be done is to include as high of a high with as low of a low...all without crossing through the price bars.

Let me see if I can explain it more clearly:

Step 1: we have the highest high for the period under consideration(it can be changed, which will affect the highest high of the period, and hence the trendline), set at 2/19/97, at $94.75

Step 2: from there, tilt that trendline as low as you can until you can't go any lower without crossing through the prices. You'll find that it simultaneously hits the bar at 3/12/97 and the bars from 6/6 to 6/10/97, and that it comes close to recent rally attempt about a weeks back.

Step 3: You can see then that the trend has not been broken on EK. The existence of the trendline resistance is not a coincidence. There are far too many traders who play this, and I was just tagging along for the downward ride on EK when it came along.

Try to follow what's next:

In EK's case, the lowest high that precedes the lowest low, while still being connected to the highest high (and without the trendline crossing through the price bar!) is in early June of 1997. It's as simple as that-- you had it right from the beginning, so you didn't miss anything at all.

Whew. Hope that didn't confuse anyone even more.

Regards,

Rainier
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext