Sequans, the investors board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Sequans, the investors board

SQNS 7.450

-2.4%

2:36 PM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: frmrVZguy

3/26/2019 2:18:53 PM

of 290

EUTC Update: Case # 40481 announced 3/5 We are 40484............................................
I don't know why my searches earlier failed to produce a search result. Strange but true.

ec.europa.eu
Antitrust/Cartels
Antitrust/Cartel Cases
New Search
Antitrust cases by event date - Last 3 months
05.03.2019
COMP/40481 Occupants Safety Systems II (No Public Version available)
22.01.2019
COMP/40049 MasterCard II (No Public Version available)
Help on how to use the case search tool
-----

EARLIER POSTS
Message 31935266

192

EUTC letter update from my inbox 10/24. Uncertain timeline 'coming weeks'

frmrVZguy

12/18/2018

Message 31693671

178

Are we there yet? Perspective on EUTC case AT.40484 versus the Google AT.40099

frmrVZguy

7/9/2018

Message 31579506

131

COMMENTARY: BLOWBACK, PITARDS, FOG, FUD - What the H3LL is really going on? Anal

frmrVZguy

4/19/2018

Message 31295177

Hello: Comments on SQNS Revenue and Lawsuit and EUTC Case Since July 1 and post

frmrVZguy

10/6/2017

(MORE ON OTHER THREAD)

---------------
ED I made these comments in a PM to another user - posting here for perspective

(Sir), what to believe...
Start with your own intelligence, IMO, of which you have plenty.

My view: SQNS is getting 'AMD'ed' and all its former customers are scared to do business with them.
The only way out of this is the same path as AMD: Regulator assistance to level the market by sanctioning the Unnamed Defendant.

The last letter from EUTC arrived on 10/24 to me and stated a dimly revealing bit of news:
- They stated they intended to "revert to me" in the coming weeks but the timeline was uncertain.
HERE's what that means: (feel free to quote me for SA readers)

- as I have stated many times, the case AT.40484 did not get Administratively Rejected back on the 5/31/17 to 7/31/17 time frame when it was scheduled to either receive either 1) REJECT or 2) Proceed to OPENING status. I have stated prior that I did not receive an Article 7 letter explaining any rejection and that was my basis for concluding it was still in some active status. NOW I KNOW for sure from Banasevic's letter 10/24.
- The one year investigation phase would thus have closed out roughly 7/31/18 as the Unnamed Defendant had one year to reply to the formal Statement of Objections they were handed around 7/31/17 a year plus ago.
- You will have noticed from news that there have been very significant personnel changes at a certain large firm associated with the known dates of this case from initial filing to the latest. You might be able to guess the firm's name but I'm not going to risk any case or libel jeopardy.
- It is possible, in my hopeful mind, that with the one year date past that Sequans will be able to reference the EUTC case in its Motions in the Renner v Sequans case that are due for 11/30 next week (Friday).

- It is possible that there is Joint Administration of the Sequans matter because: 1) I requested SEC and EUTC take Joint Administration back last year. If this occurs, then the facts that I have prepared dating all the way back to my 2014 filing of a complaint to SEC might be included in the Motions. Yes, i just revealed to you I also have a complaint with the SEC , not a lawsuit, dating 12/2014. This is the first I have revealed that fact to any person.
- If SEC and EUTC take Joint Administration then it seems a very good chance that Sequans will finally have the hero needed to level the playing field and possibly even produce penalties that 'make them whole'.
- It is my sincere hope that rather than going to a full investigation and many more years of deliberation that the Unnamed Defendant will see the rather small cost of an out of court - type settlement is superior.

- Short of a win with SEC and EUTC I have a downbeat view on Sequans ability to succeed in the Market due to Customer fear of retaliation just as AMD experienced.
Best Regards,
Happy Thanksgiving

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next