Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Fiscally Conservative

To: Taro who wrote (1128819)	4/6/2019 7:28:12 PM
From: sylvester80	1 Recommendation of 1576792

Would you fly a 737MAX anytime soon? NEVER! Boeing got greedy and knowingly put profit above safety and cut corners to facilitate the quick release of a knowingly unstable aircraft in order to counter the release of the Airbus 320Neo competition. Boeing by slapping the bigger heavier engines to an old frame, ended up changing the 737 aerodynamics to unstable and instead of designing a plane that was stall proof they ended up with a plane that is stall prone. No software can fix a fundamental design flaw. Only a complete redesign will do that. Boeing's 'single point failure': Why was there no backup system on 737 Max jet?usatoday.com Others, however, aren't so sure that Boeing can find an adequate repair, saying that the twin crashes are proof that the plane's problems run deeper than flawed sensors. They say the design itself has created inherent problems that simple fixes won't solve. "You go to the source of the problem, not the symptom," said consumer advocate Ralph Nader, who lost a niece in the Ethiopian Airlines crash. "An aircraft has to be designed stall proof, not stall prone."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next