SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Graham Osborn who wrote (61844)4/8/2019 2:26:03 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris1 Recommendation

Recommended By
sjemmeri

  Read Replies (1) of 78778
 
It just depends on whether you are investing to beat the S&P500 by a few points (as Graham's partnership did) or whether you are trying to make real money. Most of us have far better things to do with our time than beat the S&P500 by 2 points a year. Anyway, it does not take a rocket scientist to beat the S&P500 - all you have to do is dollar cost average into it when the SPE is <20 and build up cash when it is above that. Why bother picking stocks for a couple extra percentage points?


Oh really? And for how long have you made "real money"? And how much have you outperformed SP500 while making real money? And what are you doing on value investing forum? Is that "far better thing to do with your time than beating SP500"?

I think that you'd find that "beating the S&P500 by 2 points a year" is much harder than you so boldly predict. Most people here or anywhere cannot do it. Perhaps they just don't follow your simple foolproof strategy. Maybe you should publish a book for all to read and do it the ez way.

For those of you who read Forbes, there was a great article in the February edition about Herbert Wertheim, an optometrist who started investing the cash from his small business in the 1970s in industrial and technology companies. His net worth is now about 2B - incuding 100-200M positions in Microsoft and Apple purchased at their IPOs. One of his core rules - (almost) never sell. Ironically, Wertheim didn't know a thing about value investing. He is very much of the Fisher mould.
People have estimated that this optometrist in fact has underperformed SP500. But why let the facts get into the way of good story?

It sounds so simple, and yet most of the people on this board would say you should have sold Microsoft at 50-60 times earnings in 2000, or whatever.


Says a person who does not even buy Google or Facebook somewhere at 20 times earnings. LOL.

One of the lessons I've learned in my financial life - when learning from others, weight their views by their net worth.
Says a person who just bashed Mike Burry and who probably has net worth less than 1/100 or 1/1000 of Burry's. Perhaps you did not learn that lesson really? And BTW what are you doing on this forum? We all have way lower net worth than Mike (most likely).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext