2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 366.07

-0.1%

Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dvdw© who wrote (147704)	4/10/2019 4:11:49 AM
From: Snowshoe	Read Replies (1) of 217561

Hi dvdw, As the original post on this topic, I'm really puzzled by your comments... DePalma has mischaracterized the events that created his Hell Creek deposits... Those were formed by more local events the culprits are very near and can be chosen from events 1 in North Dakota called Red Wing Impactor, 2 others in Canada, and 1 from Montana. Since DePalma et al found microtektites lodged in the gills of their fossil fish that chemically match the ejecta of the Chicxulub impact, what is your basis for blaming a different impact? The Gulf of Mexico event Chicxulub being attributed herein, sent water as far north as Missouri, not much farther. What point are you trying to make with this comment? DePalma et al aren't saying that water was sent from the Chicxulub impact site to their study area. Instead they concluded that it was was affected by a local seismically-induced seiche, like those caused thousands of miles away by the 1964 Alaska earthquake... Seismic Seiches from the March 1964 Alaska Earthquake pubs.usgs.gov - Snow

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next