2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 366.07

-0.1%

Nov 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Snowshoe who wrote (147709)	4/10/2019 8:09:09 AM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (2) of 217561

You said "Since DePalma et al found microtektites lodged in the gills of their fossil fish that chemically match the ejecta of the Chicxulub impact, what is your basis for blaming a different impact? " Depalma et al....who is et al? Does the database including et all contributions, contain the signatures of the other impactors, I alluded too? Chix is a widely studied event, and a go too source for everything impactor due to its sheer scale. You do understand that the geology now referred to as the Bakken is multi layered oil zone, meaning events that made the oil, happened at different times where the probability of one of the events matched the surface conditions in place for those species to have been around. Its unlikely that Chicx is responsible, as the 4 events pointed too, are far closer, and each were significant enough in their own right, to have dispersed the microtekties, Water was not an issue in the DePalma piece, I get that, but also know that water did reach mid central MO from Chicx.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next