SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Honest Conservatives

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: sense4/18/2019 9:56:03 PM
  Read Replies (2) of 3350
 
The problems with the DNC hack story revolve around only two or three things

1. ) The dates... Republican House was trying to pin it down as "So, when did the FBI investigation begin"? That date kept shifting back, and back, as they asked more questions. Some people clearly did lie to Congress about that date ? Why ? The Republicans seem convinced the date they have ended up with, as the "final answer" from the FBI, in mid July of 2016, is also a lie. Why ?

Look at the chronology... noting clusters in the dates ? Why so many articles dated July 26 2016 ?

2.) Where did Assange source his materials ? Only he knows. Everyone else has an opinion.

3.) We were sold a bill of goods, forever, on the Steele Dossier being legit... we know now that it was a Hillary paid for dirty trick (and a crime... that spawned more crimes), but "the FBI" took it, accepted it, pushed it, presented it to the FISA court... and only now, two plus years later, are we finally digging out from under that pile of dung with the truth that, no, Trump is not a Russian agent. (But Assange is ? LOL!!!) .

That very same (known corrupt) FBI refused to take the (known corrupt) DNC's server to look at it themselves, (thus creating the problem we're talking about) and instead simply accepted the same (known corrupt) Democrats paid for work in (known corrupt) Crowdstrike's paid for opinion... same thing as with the Dossier... and we're still stuck on pretending that's legit ? Why ?

Noting those three issues, here's a few links worth having as resources as this plays out: :

Wikipedia: DNC E-mail Leak

Wikipedia: Guccifer 2.0


Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story


Discussion by Hackers re "Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't buy the Russia Story"


The link above contains a lot of VERY obvious "spin" being applied... in hindsight, effort made in tracking that kind of thing down might be more revealing than expected when it was posted... but also note how few seemed to be buying it ? Hackers know computers... you won't baffle them with BS about them, what's possible, and what's likely.

Note the date:
Croudstrike (June 15 2016) crowdstrike.com "are believed to be closely linked to the Russian government’s powerful and highly capable intelligence services"




Seth Rich Channeled


Seth Rich murder: early on Sunday morning, July 10th, 2016.


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext