hi ken
i have been laging on computer time but watch for the
name "Mikemct1". The second part of my thoughts in answering
his concern may shed "some humble light"
Just wanted you to know my thoughts parallel yours and Mikes,
and in thinking "simplicity" the stuff developing looks
do-able. The path of least resistance seems the best, and
getting 100 with them seems possible and inexpensive (if they
define the words "with them" appropriately)
Pressed with other things, i'll out with the thoughts when i
can. sorry about timeliness, but in this case, i think we
might have a little to spare and some nice suprises if CVIA's
function (purpose) follows it's form (progressive as in speed
and efficiency).
i can't imagine cvia buying the cinderblocks
that house the mom & pops just how, but being involved in the
paperwork and exchange as the several products are being marketed,
yes. And the cookie cutting system they are adapting
is important and must allow for rapid, efficient, and inexpensive
agreement making. In other words, CVIA/WOTD should be touching
ground as little as effectively necessary with each mom & pop
as a real effort to be realised is in the speed of geographical
expansion for which it's function, by definition,
has been designed. Success there should give the stock value.
I'll continue to try chatting about my guesses later.
dave |
