SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 368.29+0.6%Nov 7 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (148067)4/28/2019 7:12:46 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations

Recommended By
SirWalterRalegh
THE ANT

  Read Replies (1) of 217580
 
For about 20 years after I started pondering and observing the CO2 matter I thought it was a scientific issue.

Then it dawned on me early this century that while I was thinking science and observation to determine the extent of the possible problem, other people had simply adopted a political position.

So Loony Liberal Lefties were predictably believers in the Greenhouse Effect as a big problem while the political right was not buying it.

I have found that the ability of all to do actual thinking is about zero as they defend their belief ideology.

I on the other hand cannot be wrong because I am happy either way and all I have done is figure out the various effects and observe the settled science predictions and scientific monitoring and the actual observations I can directly make to determine for myself what actuality does.

In 1984 I told my boss how to solve the possible problem by way of big tax cuts on computers etc and putting big taxes on carbon combustion.

In 1986 I invented a method to sequester CO2 from Orimulsion in power stations and concluded electric cars would run rings around my gasoline business with its problematic pollutants and thousand moving part engines with 30% fuel efficiency .

In 1987 I had decided the main climatic effect was enhanced plant growth due to CO2 boost. Glasshouse growers had bought fuel oil from me to enrich their glasshouse and warm them so I was aware of the benefits of CO2.

It's quite annoying having people who have learned a little like Haim showing simplistic diagrams and telling me to shut up and learn.

I note he still hasn't said what the landslide had to do with the price of fish. That's how they "discuss" things ....

I can't be wrong because all I have done is consider the many mechanisms of climate, observe directly and read scientific observations and compare predictions with reality. From those observations I do not see a threat at 500ppm or even 600ppm since 400ppm up from 280ppm has done near enough to nothing.

Meanwhile Peak People and Peak Petroleum loom in 2037.

I'm happy either way....
CO2 is a problem = easy to fix
CO2 is good = carry on and reconsider at 500ppm.

Meanwhile reality is less than 1 degree Celsius after 100 years of vast effort to increase CO2 with the little ice having just ended. Sea level rise gas continued at the sluggish pace is decades. Tsunamis are the sea level rise risk.

I'd quite enjoy CO2 turning out to be an actual problem just to see the Global Alarmists squeal and whimper when I hit them with big time carbon taxes. I can get by very happily without burning carbon but the hypocrites like fat Al Gore can't. "But but but I bought indulgences so I can fly to climate jamborees...."

Mqurice

ps thanks for the invitation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News