SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 422.21+1.9%Jan 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (148118)4/28/2019 10:25:13 PM
From: Elroy Jetson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
elmatador

  Read Replies (1) of 219286
 
Like Boeing, Airbus doesn't display the Calculated Angle of Attack anywhere on the pilot's display. Nor does Airbus have any light or indicator if the two AOA sensors in the AIDRU disagree, even though this is one of the factors that can automatically disengage the auto-pilot and reboot the three flight computers.

It will be interesting to see if any of Boeing's or Airbus customers decide they want this information added to their display, which Boeing is willing to do and I'm sure Airbus would as well. The complaint most frequently heard is the information displays are nefariously overloaded with information not directly useful to the pilot.

Once co-pilot Pierre Cedric Bonin was flying the Air France flight 447 under Alternate Flight Law, he seemed to get the completely wrong idea. Each time the Stall Warning sounded, he should have pitched the nose down, like an MCAS would, but he never did. An MCAS would have been done for him even with the flight computers out of service and everyone onboard Air France 447 would have been saved.

Instead, every time the Stall Warning sounded, Bonin pitched up the maximum bringing the aircraft's speed below 125 mph, shutting off the warning because it assumed he was trying to land.
Roughly 20 seconds later, at 02:12 UTC, the Bonin decreased the aircraft's pitch slightly, airspeed indications became valid, and the stall warning sounded again; it then sounded intermittently for the remaining duration of the flight, but stopped when the pilot increased the aircraft's nose-up pitch.

From there until the end of the flight, the angle of attack never dropped below 35 degrees. From the time the aircraft stalled until its impact with the ocean, the engines were primarily developing either 100 percent N1 or TOGA thrust, though they were briefly spooled down to about 50 percent N1 on two occasions. The engines always responded to commands and were developing in excess of 100 percent N1 when the flight ended.

First officer Robert said to himself, "climb" four times. Bonin heard this and replied, "But I've been at maximum nose-up for a while!"

Captain Dubois realized Bonin was causing the stall, causing him to shout, "No no no, don't climb!"

The aircraft was now too low to recover from the stall. Shortly thereafter, the Ground proximity warning system sounded an alarm, warning the crew about the aircraft's now imminent crash with the ocean.

Bonin, realizing the situation, said: "Fuck! We're going to crash! This can't be true. But what's happening?" Sorry dear, no MCAS safety feature on an Airbus.

The final data showed the Airbus 330 Air France flight 447 hit the water falling vertically at 124 mph, and moving forward at a mere 123 mph, all because they had no MCAS.

What Knave would fail to install an MCAS on such an advanced and costly aircraft. It could have saved everyone?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext