| | | POTUS Hillary R Clinton : America's Last President
quodverum.com
Historians always remind us that in order to understand the present, we need to study the past.
I'm going to add another angle - in order to predict the future, we need to study the present, as well.
Over the last two weeks and today, America has witnessed very disturbing - and revealing - behavior by the Democrats in Congress.
Be under no illusion. In a last ditch stand, a desperate Obama and Clinton, who by now know what is coming, are directing everything we are seeing. They are controlling the Democrats in Congress, as well as the narratives being parroted by their lugenpresse.
It may be too late for them now but in my view, they will still instruct their slaves to impeach President Donald J Trump. They know that there is no chance of success, but that isn't the point. It's a political 'hail mary' pass. Fast running out of options, they will use impeachment to continue smearing the President with lies and innuendo, for as long as they can, to distract their exhausted base and influence the 2020 Presidential election.
Stalin's Lavrentiy Beria and Hitler's Josef Goebbels would be proud of their efforts, if they were alive to witness the appalling spectacle we are watching.
Why? Because Obama and Clinton are using totalitarian tactics, that they mastered. And like Beria and Goebbels, Obama and Clinton will fail. However, they will try to cause as much damage on the way out, as they can.
That's what totalitarians do.
Obama's Legacy : TotalitarianismWhat we are witnessing right now should be of no surprise to anyone, who is reasonably informed.
The Democrats come across as police state thugs.
Trained apparatchiks who find themselves out of power, but don't seem to have realized it yet.
Without power, their totalitarian impulse is exposed. It's an impulse that is learned. One they were indoctrinated in, from being part of Barack Obama's administration.
We must always remember that Obama was a very dangerous and radical ideologue. Essentially a marxist, his ideological position was founded on government control of the masses, as well as the distribution of power and government revenues, along ideological lines. His platform was transformative and revolutionary - the aim was to subsume the American Republic into a global coalition of borderless, 'post nation-state' regional entities.
In Obama's mind, this could not be achieved without centralized control of the masses. Which, of course, justified spying on his rivals and enemies.
Sane people call it totalitarianism, or dictatorship.
Obama and his crew called it 'Hope and Change'.
It is now quite obvious that by 2016 (in fact, well before), Obama had already successfully put in place the structure of a future dictatorial government, his only constraint being the citizenry's expectation of regular elections. As is proven by his outrageous actions between 2015-2017, it is now clear that the supreme narcissist Obama thought little of elections and despised anyone who disagreed with his ideological goals.
To him, they were an obstacle to his transformation of America.
This attitude permitted a set of frightening behaviors in the Obama administration, that we still only know a fraction about. There is little doubt that what we have seen exposed in his FBI and DOJ, infected his entire administration. Obama's acolytes put aside their duty to the American Constitution to embark on a covert power grab, trashing the freedoms of American citizens along the way.
There's still so much that we are about to learn about Obama's weaponization - and attempted transformation - of the American Republic, into a progressive leftist gulag.
Of course, such was Obama's hold on the levers of power and his contempt for American citizens, the masses would never have known that he and Clinton rigged the 2016 election, if she had won.
Which would have provided a POTUS Clinton with all the space she needed, to consolidate her power.
POTUS Clinton : American Dictatorship?POTUS Obama was building a totalitarian state, to use power for ideological objectives.
The Clintons are no ideologues. In my view, they would have turned Obama's state into a dictatorship, to use power to line their own pockets.
Another thing : in my opinion, she would have been a far more repressive and dangerous leader than Obama.
Hillary Clinton would have been America's last POTUS.
Let's consider just ten of the likely steps a POTUS Clinton would have taken after victory, to consolidate total power.
Cover UpBleachbit and destruction of Blackberry phones with hammers, tell you all you need to know. As does the fact that Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, never used her official government email. And that she routed all electronic email communications through a private, unsecured server in her home. Oh - did I mention that there was no IG at State during her tenure, providing oversight?
Imagine if she was POTUS. Any evidence that existed anywhere of Clinton criminality or corruption would have been deleted, eliminated, removed, destroyed.
Ditto, all of her inner circle would have been protected in the same way.
Division of SpoilsObviously, all the conspirators in SpyGate would have expected rewards, for their criminal conduct in 2015-2017.
At the top, Obama and the Clintons.
I mention 'the Clintons' deliberately, because once in power this would have been the Bill and Hillary Clinton Presidency. With apparatchiks in place all over their administration, massive 'pay for play' corruption would have started at the very top. It would have been a free for all for their Clinton Foundation, with bribes and rewards all the way down to maintain the cover-up.
Obama would have been venerated as one of the great Presidents, with statues, books and movies produced in his name. In my opinion, his ultimate objective was to become the United Nations Secretary General, which of course he would have got.
As for the rest? There are so many. They would have been spread across the administration, to consolidate Clinton's power. In my view, Brennan would have remained in place at the CIA and given free reign to embark on a reign of terror with the new FBI Director, a young and pliable Peter Strzok. Loretta Lynch? SCOTUS.
Comey ? PURGED.
Purges, Spying & IntimidationThere is little doubt that POTUS Clinton would have expanded the massive illegal spying system she inherited from Obama. In my view, she would have also expanded its application to take down anyone she viewed as a threat.
Remember, Obama loved spying on Americans. This suited his ideological objectives, but also satisfied the sense of power his narcissism demanded. We know the Obama administration was spying on at least the Trump campaign team, between 2015-2017. But his illegal spying, in conjunction with Brennan, stretched as far back as at least 2010. They spied on journalists and their families. They spied on members of Congress. They spied on political rivals, famously unleashing a weaponised IRS onto them.
It's likely that thousands of innocent Americans were being spied on illegally, between 2008-2016.
Obama had already built a very powerful and illegal spying operation by 2016. Illegal tapping of the powerful NSA database was ongoing. In June 2013, Maxine Waters unwisely revealed that Obama had built his own powerful database, that no one knew about:
'The thing I think some people are missing here is the president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful…that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.'
In addition, the same people Obama used to target innocent Americans, would have been ready to go on day 1 for the new POTUS Clinton. Americans would have watched that team in action very early in a Clinton presidency, as she executed her first purge. This would have likely followed the MO they used on Donald Trump, Carter Page and General Flynn - framing them for things they need committed, using fabricated or manipulated evidence.
Clinton's first purge would have been particularly cruel, in my opinion. Donald Trump, his family, team and associates, as well as any donors would have been destroyed. Prominent conservative voices and cultural figures across the board would have been targeted, including anyone on social media that was deemed influential. Any political threats, including those in the military and intelligence communities, would have been taken out.
Be in no doubt, the Trump family would have been destroyed, framed as agents of Russia. Donald J Trump in particular, who the Clintons fear, would likely have been tried and found guilty of treason. Then removed from the equation, silenced and left to rot in solitary in a maximum security penitentiary.
Purges would have been a regular feature of Clinton's presidency, in my opinion. A cruel and vindictive woman with an evil soul, Clinton would likely have enjoyed them. In addition, they would have been an effective method of maintaining control over allies.
Ideological Collectivisation & InfantilizationOne of the key characteristics of Obama's support base is their inability to think. By that, I mean the ability to be critical - to evaluate positions on all sides, considering and evaluating credible evidence.
This skill used to be celebrated among western democracies. It has always been loathed by totalitarians, however, as it threatens their ability to control thought. Critical thinkers tend to be curious and question everything they're told, as well as to express their own opinions on issues.
Obama hated critical thinkers. Independent minds frightened him, as General Flynn found out at the DIA.
Instead, Obama preferred being able to tell people what to think. By infiltrating schools and universities with curriculums based on far left liberal progressive ideology, as well as apparatchiks to 'teach' it, Obama was quite successful at propagandizing an entire generation.
As I have noted many times before, Obama also infantilized them. Look at his base now. They have an almost childlike, utopian view of the world that bears no relation to its realities. Despite the mountain of evidence that implicates both Obama and Clinton between 2015 - 2017, they are simply unable to accept that Obama's lugenpresse have lied to them, for years. Even now, gullible and naive, many believe anything that FakeNews tells them.
Clinton would have definitely continued this. A sleeping and indoctrinated population that has no diversity of thought, is very easy to control and manipulate. It also makes it much easier to demonize, smear and destroy rivals.
Propaganda Ministry & Lugenpresse / FakeNewsAs we have experienced over the last four years, the media outlets collectively known as the 'mainstream media' (MSM) were thoroughly inflitrated by Obama and Clinton operatives.
This was done in an organized and structured campaign, run by Ben Rhodes.
For example, key executives within media outlets were married, or related to, Obama officials. 'Experts' were often ex-intelligence community agents, allied to Obama. It's likely that outlets were provided with funding by the Obama administration, diverted through PACs and by other means.
What resulted was a self-supporting and corrupt propaganda machine. It was weaponized. For example, take the Carter Page FISA. Obama's intelligence agencies leaked false stories to their media operatives, who published them as articles. The articles would then be used by the same intel agencies as 'evidence' in FISA applications. The links between the 'reporters' and intel agencies were never disclosed.
The same method was used to create and promote the Trump/Russia lie.
I fear that we will discover that many Americans have been targeted in this manner, between 2008-2016.
Of course, no one would have been aware of this corruption and criminality, if Clinton had won. As POTUS, complete control of a FakeNews apparatus -probably with Rhodes in charge - would have been a frightening weapon at Clinton's disposal, that she would have used often to spread propaganda and destroy rivals.
Control of the InternetWe would have also seen Clinton take control of the internet. Why?
The internet is the last refuge for independent thinkers, determined to come to their own conclusions.
It's the existence of open source information on the internet, that allows free thinkers to research and debunk the partisan lies from MSM apparatchiks.
We know that Obama had seen this threat. He had already started his campaign to gain control of internet content, as well as to begin repressing freedom of expression online.
Clinton would have completed that process, ensuring that she had total control of information that was available to the public. Censorship of content and expression, not to mention punitive campaigns against those indulging in 'wrong think', would have intensified and become commonplace.
Personality CultOne of Clinton's key assets, now being dismantled 24/7, is her ability to promote herself as a heroic and noble woman, victimized by evil enemies, dedicating her life to America.
That anyone ever believed such nonsense beggars belief, but they did. Many still do.
The Hillary cult would have become far more pronounced, if she had won the Presidency. It would have been very difficult to resist as well.
Abolition of 2nd AmendmentBy the end of her first term, the second amendment would have been removed from the Constitution and disarming of the citizenry by force would be well underway. Of course, this would be a very important step in the process of consolidating power.
Suspension of Electoral CollegeThis would also have been a priority. The electoral college would have been abolished, to be replaced by a voting system that guaranteed Democratic Party power forever. Disenfranchisement of the electorate would have been easier than many assume. Most Americans had no clue about the electoral college until POTUS Trump won the 2016 election.
If Clinton had won, they still wouldn't.
Never-Ending WarWithout a doubt, Clinton would have continued the war-mongering that characterized the administration of Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.
War keeps the population distracted.
War creates enemies and fear in populations, that can be used by malign leaders to increase control.
Most importantly, war means BIG money. And two of the greediest people on this planet are Hillary and Bill Clinton.
They have always loved money, more than power.
What I have set out above are just ten ways that I believe a POTUS Hillary Clinton would have used to consolidate power, by expanding the scale, reach and aggression of Obama's totalitarian state. No doubt readers can think of more.
The result would have been a dictatorship, wearing the clothing of democracy.
It would have been the beginning of a dark time for America and of course, the free world.
The Price of Freedom : Eternal VigilanceSome may be reading this and finding it unrealistic, or hyperbolic. Fair enough. But consider this : between 2015-2017, Obama and Clinton conspired to fabricate evidence , illegally spy on and destroy the lives of high profile, powerful patriots - to cheat Hillary's way to the Oval Office.
And remember, they didn't just do this before the election. They intensified the effort AFTER the election.
And even worse, after the inauguration.
These are sick, dangerous people.
Ask yourself - if they were willing to destroy Trump, what would stop them from targeting YOU?
Answer: nothing would. Still think I'm being hyperbolic? That it couldn't happen in America?
Of course it could.
What I have described above is not unique, or new. A descent into totalitarianism has happened many times before in different parts of the world, in countries that once enjoyed relative freedom.
And whose citizens had taken their freedom for granted. Citizens who fell asleep and let foxes into the chicken house.
They forgot the meaning of the phrase, 'eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.'
For those few readers who still think it could never happen in America, here's a truth bomb for you - Obama had ALREADY started it.
And many Americans WERE asleep, as he did it.
Luckily, one very powerful citizen was NOT.
In fact, he was very much AWAKE.
Donald J Trump was vigilant. He was watching. And he decided to act.
Making America Great AgainWe must be eternally grateful for President Donald J Trump. And always remain vigilant.
Yes, the population elected POTUS Trump, on that famous 8th day of November, 2016.
But it is POTUS Trump and his team who took down a coup, snared the Obama/Clinton network and are now ready to start to restore the rule of law.
It's Trump who has somehow borne the burden of relentless attack, fighting at times a one-man war against malign, evil actors bent on his and America's destruction.
POTUS Trump understands that the the American Republic is strongest when power is not taken from the citizenry, but given back to them. That's the example America sets to the rest of the freedom-loving world and why the USA is such an important bulwark, against tyranny.
He is WINNING. As are we.
In conclusion, despite what leftists may delude themselves with, what happened, happened.
America came close to being snuffed out, by enemies of the Republic.
And it must never happen again.
POTUS 45 is saving America.
The United States of America is roaring back.
President Donald J Trump, working with the American citizenry, is Making America Great Again. |
|
