Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1133762)	5/8/2019 1:42:15 AM
From: Heywood40	Read Replies (3) of 1585369

Those numbers simply don't work for FatRump. Only improvements on real property are depreciable, not the underlying property. And they are depreciable only to the extent of their value when acquired, with depreciation taken over a 27.5 year period. Those 10 years represent about 1/3 of the depreciable timeframe, so... In order to depreciate $1.17B in 10 years, he'd have to have paid well over $3B for just the improvements, prior to 1985. Nobody believes he had anywhere near that much in depreciable assets, then, now, or ever. FatRump is truly the Biggest Loser in the entire USA. I think it's important for all you FatRump Kool-Aid drinkers to finally be able to see and understand this. Today is an important first big step in your FatRump cult de-programming.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next