SI Grammar and Spelling Lab Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rambi who wrote (788)	1/20/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Thom A. Shulok	Read Replies (2) of 4710

Okay, enough lurking, time to stick my head in the piranha bucket... As a student of predictive linguistics, I think the short i is more economical from the verbo-musculative perspective. Try saying the -liv fragment both ways: long i and short i. The long i involves a glottal (the vibration deep in your throat) that requires more effort and may demonstrate slightly more barbaric undertones. The short i simply requires far less effort to execute. Given that most people are like electrons (path of least resistance) and really hate to project the appearance of barbarism in these enlightened times, it might be reasonable to expect the long i version to disappear entirely, except among isolated groups of overachieving barbaric types. Thom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next