MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Donahoe who wrote (16464)	1/20/1998 9:41:00 PM
From: Keith Hankin	Read Replies (1) of 24154

It is clear that the judge did not intend for MSFT to deliver a non-working version of Win95. Such an interpretation is clearly an attempt at being cute. If MSFT is not clear what the actual intention is, don't you think that they could simply ask the judge what he meant? Anyone using a common-sense approach would clearly understand that what was meant is to remove the stuff that is only used by IE. Moreover, MSFT's interpretation of the judge's order is not even consistent. If their interpretation is literal in that any code that is used by IE must be removed, then they must remove nearly the entire OS, since most of the basic functionality provided by the OS is used by IE, including file i/o and Win32 GUI support. I don't believe that this is what they have offered, so clearly there must be some other guiding principle that MSFT is using in their attempts at complying with the judge's order. Please give me an interpretation of their approach that is consistent with the judge's order, either literally or "in-the-spirit"? The ball's in your court.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next