SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis
SOXX 314.52-0.6%Dec 11 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: robert b furman who wrote (83344)5/23/2019 10:22:30 AM
From: Return to Sender  Read Replies (2) of 95572
 
Yes, I agree Bob that QCOM probably never should have received the patents that allow them to charge their licensing fees. That said these lawsuits have been going on forever. For every judge who tries to invalidate them there is another who upholds them.

This is an oversimplification but because of QCOM's patent position they can essentially charge for any kind of data, or sound, sent over the airwaves until their patents are completely invalidated.

I just don't see that happening.

RtS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News