SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1137067)5/28/2019 3:35:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) of 1573683
 
Winfastorlose, of course Jefferson Davis was going to downplay the role of slavery in the conflict between North vs. South. Many people in the South started getting a lot of moral compunctions regarding slavery, but they tried their best to deflect abolition, fearing that their economy could not withstand the shock. In effect they viewed slavery as a necessary evil.

Lincoln was very much concerned over the breakup of the union. Makes sense, given that no American president would want such a breakup happening on his watch. Hence the reasons why he tried his very best to not upset the southern slaveholders. Even when the Civil War broke out, Lincoln was hesitant to make the war about abolishing slavery. Only later did he issue his Emancipation Proclamation.

But make no mistake: Lincoln was always morally opposed to slavery, both in public and in private. His original hopes were to see the gradual end of slavery as an institution through more "organic" means (can't think of a better word at the moment). But even that drew sharp criticism from his political opponents in the years before the war, which no doubt helped to drive secessionist sentiment in the South.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext