SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (1138336)6/1/2019 12:20:30 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo

  Read Replies (2) of 1576295
 
MUELLER DINGS DOWD

In its Volume II the Mueller Report treats a voicemail message from President Trump’s (unnamed) personal counsel to counsel for former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn (also unnamed) as potentially obstructive of the investigation. The facts are set forth at pages 293-294 of the report. The message is quoted in part at page 294. The report’s analysis is set forth at pages 298-300.

The report finds the message potentially obstructive: it “could have had the potential to Flynn’s decision to cooperate, as well as the extent of that cooperation.” In its analysis of the message, the report states: “Because of privilege issues…we could not determine whether the President was personally involved in or knew about the specific message his counsel delivered to Flynn’s counsel.” I reviewed this part of the Mueller Report here, citing all relevant pages and noting that the Trump attorney leaving the message goes unnamed in the report.

Yesterday prosecutors released a full transcript of the voicemail in issue. The release made news. I have the AP story at the link. The transcript was released by order of Judge Emmet Sullivan requiring disclosure of documents gathered by the government in Flynn’s case. Now we know the Trump attorney who left the message was John Dowd and that he left the message with Flynn attorney Rob Kelner. Flynn turned it over to Mueller following his guilty plea as part of his agreement to cooperate with the Special Counsel.

The AP report on the release of the transcript linked above fails to quote any of the newly released material. Why might that be? The CNN story by Katelyn Polantz is more detailed. It includes the full transcript of the message as well as a statement from Dowd.

Well, lookie here.

View image on Twitter





Rosie memos@almostjingo





Once again #MuellerReport edited messages to make them appear more damaging, full transcript of this phone call reveals Dowd’s message was pretty typical for a lawyer and he clearly states he’s not interested in any confidential info. What else did they manipulate



2,892

2:37 PM - May 31, 2019




2,581 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

Our friend Techno Fog also obtained a statement from Mr. Dowd. Mr. Fog conveys Dowd’s displeasure.

View image on Twitter





Techno Fog@Techno_Fog





EXCLUSIVE

We got a statement from former Trump lawyer John Dowd, responding to the Special Counsel's deceptive edits of his voicemail to Flynn's lawyer

"It is unfair and despicable. It was a friendly privileged call between counsel - with NO conflict. I think Flynn got screwed"



3,066

4:31 PM - May 31, 2019




2,179 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

On this episode the Mueller Report makes no sense in any event. I have yet to see an intelligent discussion of the report’s treatment of it. My own analysis may therefore be off, but consider this. If Dowd’s message to Kelner was obstructive, as the report asserts, Dowd himself would be liable whether or not he acted at the president’s behest or with his knowledge. Attorneys have no right to commit crimes on behalf of their principal.

Indeed, there is a crime/fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. See, for example, the matter of Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen. The exception would clearly apply to conversations in which the principal instructs the attorney to undertake obstructive action. I declare this aspect of the Mueller Report a complete and utter crock.

And that’s not all. For some reason or other, the government has failed to produce additional documents responsive to Judge Sullivan’s order. The CNN story notes: “Regarding the Kislyak call, another key piece about Flynn in the Mueller report, prosecutors appear to say they don’t believe they need to hand over other recording transcripts they may have involving Flynn, because they were not used in his sentencing recommendation. But their explanation in the filing Friday isn’t extensive.”

Something’s happening here. I do believe that Attorney General Barr has his hands full in trying to get to the bottom of it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext