SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 375.93-1.8%Nov 14 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (149164)6/16/2019 4:30:03 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
isopatch

   of 217780
 
The reason hydrogen is considered as a vehicle fuel is because of Climate Change bullshit.

Hydrogen is horrible.

If there were megatons of it lying around waiting to be used, like oil, coal, methane, then it might make sense. But there isn't.

It's attached to carbon or oxygen. It's expensive to get it from the ground or the ocean into a car.

CO2 produced by people is not a problem. It's a good thing. At 1000 ppm it might worth reconsidering. But before we get there everyone will be dead. Peak People 2037. With fewer people and better technology CO2 will go out of fashion.

When, not if, an asteroid makes a splash in the Pacific ocean, there won't be talk of 20cm sea level rise in 100 years. It's instant sea level rise that is a problem. Recall Fukushima and many thousands of Japanese.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News